- exploit third-world workers
- increase unemployment
- reduce domestic wages
- erode workers' rights
- censor media
- debase local cultures
What if that child, by going to work, is providing his family with food. Would you rather the family starve? Should the child resort to violence to feed his family? No, he should work. What if the company he is working for is providing housing, education and contributing in other beneficial ways to the community? Should he not work? Would the community have been better off not giving that opportunity? Some of you will argue yes. You are entitled to your opinion. Just know that there's always more than one viewpoint. Take both sides and filter them for yourself to arrive at an even greater truth.

0 comments:
Post a Comment